Eaghan Wright

Work

Health Insurance Literacy
for First-Time Enrollees

RESEARCH

2026 · 10 week timeline

CONTEXT

We studied how young adults choose and manage employer-sponsored health insurance the first time they enroll on their own. Using a mixed-methods study, one pattern held across all four methods: the problem isn’t access to information — it’s translation.

MY ROLE

UX Researcher on a team of four, contributing across:

  • Research Planning

  • Research Execution

  • Data Synthesis

  • Design Opportunities

COLLABORATORS

Natalia Avella · Kate Besel · Eaghan Wright · Carly Zuklin

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Young adults selecting employer-sponsored health insurance for the first time encounter employer-provided resources that fail to establish meaningful insurance literacy. Because most enter enrollment feeling healthy and perceiving little immediate need for care, they move through it quickly and learn only the costs that bill them directly.

Without the resources to evaluate their options based on estimated annual cost, out-of-pocket costs, deductibles, and premiums become the primary factors in decision-making. Most anchor on the cheapest available option and move on quickly, without understanding what their plan covers or what they’ll actually spend across the year.

When they do need care, the portals and cost tools fail to provide the information needed, and coverage gaps surface, often resulting in unexpected bills and avoidance of future treatment.

USER GROUPS

PRIMARY

The First-Time Enrollee

Ages 22–28, typically a recent graduate within the last five years, enrolling in their own employer-sponsored plan for the first time. They are digitally fluent, cost-sensitive, and generally healthy, which makes thorough plan research feel low-priority.

CORE NEEDS

Guidance selecting a plan that actually fits their life and medical needs.

BEHAVIORS

Spends minimal time learning about enrollment and plan selection.

METHODOLOGY

Use this section to explain your research approach, participants, and how you turned evidence into a direction.

STUDY SETUP

Replace with the research objectives and questions that guided this project.

METHODS

Replace with the methods you used and why each was appropriate.

PARTICIPANTS

Replace with your sample, recruitment criteria, and study context.

SYNTHESIS

Replace with how you analyzed the evidence and identified patterns.

INSIGHTS

Connect each finding to its evidence. Keep the headline concise and explain what it means for the experience.

INSIGHT / REPLACE WITH A KEY FINDING

Add the supporting observation, participant quote, or research artifact here. Duplicate this card for additional insights.

OPPORTUNITY

From research to a clearer experience

Replace with the design opportunity your findings revealed. Explain whose needs it serves, what should change, and what success would look like.

HOW MIGHT WE

How might we…?

Replace with a focused question that bridges the user need and your design exploration.

DESIGN EXPLORATION

Use this section for concepts, prototypes, and iterations. Explain the decision behind each image rather than presenting a gallery without context.

Add your research or design artifact

Replace this area with a study diagram, concept, prototype, or annotated screen.

Artifact caption — explain what changed and why.